> On Jan 27, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Nikita Popov wrote: >> Automatically implementing interfaces based on implemented methods could >> also be a general language feature (see Go interfaces for example), but >> likely not one we're interested in having in it's full generality. In this >> particular case, it seems useful though. >> >> Regards, >> Nikita > > I believe Anthony Ferrara proposed "Weak interfaces" once many years ago, > which is essentially what you're describing. It didn't get much traction > although I'm unclear why. (Possibly just less familiarity with Go at the > time?) > > I agree not all interfaces should be implicit, but having > implicitly-implementable interfaces does sound generally useful. That > shouldn't block this RFC, but might this RFC be a model for how to implement > such things more generically in the future? > > --Larry Garfield
Glad to see you picked up on this Larry. I don't think "Weak Interfaces" became an RFC unless Google is failing me, but I found a reference to it being on the mailing list from Matthieu Napoli's article on GitHub about decoupling, which is worth a read: https://github.com/mnapoli/mnapoli.github.io/blob/master/articles/decoupling-packages.md As far as Go's implicit interfaces, I have found that to be one of the most compelling language features of Go, and would be ecstatic if we could find a way to support implicit interfaces in PHP. -Mike -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
