>
> What are your thoughts about syntax such as the following, similar to the
> syntax for Java (only for use of functions/constants from the root scope)
>
> <?php
> namespace My\NS;
> use function *;
> use const *;
> // can use functions/constants from namespaces that aren't the global
> namespace to override '*'
> // "use *" is not valid.
> printf("PHP Version is: %s\n", PHP_VERSION);
>
I am in support of this, and my personal code still doesn't use
namespaces at all due to things like this, relating to the handling of
functions in the language. I personally think that the whole
'autoloading' concept is a bad idea, and ahead of time import and
compilation to bytecode, as offered by preloading is a far better
idea.
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 00:02, tyson andre <tysonandre...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> What are your thoughts about syntax such as the following, similar to the
> syntax for Java (only for use of functions/constants from the root scope)
>
> <?php
> namespace My\NS;
> use function *;
> use const *;
> // can use functions/constants from namespaces that aren't the global
> namespace to override '*'
> // "use *" is not valid.
> printf("PHP Version is: %s\n", PHP_VERSION);
>
> A similar opt-in directive syntax "use function root;" was mentioned as an
> alternative to the "Deprecation of fallback to root scope" RFC
> https://marc.info/?l=php-internals&m=151788196501507&w=2 . (I couldn't find
> any other mentions after a quick search)
>
> Benefits of "use function *":
> - Visually cleaner and less prone to merge conflicts than "use" for dozens of
> functions/constants all from the root scope. (or writing \printf("PHP Version
> is: %s\n", \PHP_VERSION), or mixes of the above)
> - Due to the absence of function autoloading (not supported in php to
> performance overhead), functions outside the global scope are rare in
> practice.
> - This would make it easier to make edits to a project (if the project's code
> style involves the unambiguous use of functions/global constants)
> - This makes using unambiguous functions/global constants easier. (for a
> small performance boost due to the php interpreter not needing to check both
> namespaces, opcache knowing exactly which function/constant it is, etc)
> - Does not break third-party code
>
> The other RFC https://wiki.php.net/rfc/fallback-to-root-scope-deprecation had
> the following notable objections, and I'm not sure of the current status of
> it:
>
> - Deprecating the behavior of existing code would break (possibly
> unmaintained) third-party libraries and require a lot of code changes,
> discouraging updates
>
> "use function *;" wouldn't.
> - Some mocking libraries will declare functions in namespaces being tested,
> with the same name as the global function.
> My proposal has similar drawbacks - third party code that started using
> "use function *" would break those libraries (but so would manually adding
> the same namespace uses).
>
> But there are alternatives to those libraries, such as uopz, runkit7, and
> SoftMocks (SoftMocks changes the class autoloader to replace code with
> instrumented code).
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
