Hello Christian,

Saturday, July 10, 2004, 10:35:38 AM, you wrote:

> Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> I don't think it's a matter of giving the engine a try. I think we first 
>> need to make a decision what the best way to go is and then we can 
>> discuss implementation if/what is possible. Once 5.0.0 is out I'm going 

> Thanks for these words of wisdom, Andi.

> Dismissing a solution because the implementation seems hard at first is 
> not what we should do here.

Well normally we just commit don't we? Also believe me or not i worked out
my patch very hard and tried other things to. But feel free to ignore my
efforts.

 >> At 01:54 AM 7/10/2004 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
>>>  coalesce would be:
>>>  "coalesce" "(" <var> ( "," <var> )* [ "," <expr> ] ")"

> Actually I'd prefer
>    "coalesce" "(" <expr> ( "," <expr> )* ")"
> with either the whole expression evaluation silenced or only in the case 
> where <expr> is a <var>.

> I'll have a go at it as soon as I find time.

Anyway i appreciate if you try to find a solution! As a hint <var> and
<expr> are two very different things. That's why i chose the syntax to
be "ifsetor(<var>,<expr>)". And i am quite sure we cannot change <var>
to <expr>


-- 
Best regards,
 Marcus                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to