At 12:26 AM 7/9/2004 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Marc,
Thursday, July 8, 2004, 11:54:59 PM, you wrote:
> Marcus Boerger wrote:
>> >> ?: would require a default value. ifsetor() allows to assume NULL hence >> the latter is more powerfull. Hence id like to see a new keyword. >>
> Well am not sure what you mean by more powerful, but the character count > is about the same:
> $a = ifsetor($b);
it would allow two versions by having the default optional:
1) $a = ifsetor($b) 2) $a = ifsetor($b, NULL)
> $a = $b ?: NULL;
How would the operator do the second? Will it look like the following?
$a = $b ?:;
I defitively don't want that.
> And the second one has the advantage of being more verbose.
That's why ifsetor has two versions.
regards marcus
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
