--- Nuno Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can anybody
take a look into this, please?
> 

>From having a look in the source, and more pain with
pgsql than anyone should be subjected to, I think
what's happening is a cross-confusion of two issues.

You're right in that if you call it with three
parameters the validation equates to your
interpretation, not his, and the column can be
specified as either string (name) or long (number).

Where *he's* going wrong is in dealing with pgsql's
case-handling. Postgres will lower-case all column
names by default, *unless* you wrap them in quotes
when you create the table to preserve the casing. This
means that you have to wrap the column names in quotes
(to preserve the casing) in *every damn statement /
query* you make to that table thereafter. What he's
doing is initialising the column name *directly* with
the return value of another query, but not wrapping it
in escaped quotes, so postgres is treating the
$fieldname in the later pg_field_prtlen() call as
'second_column' and not '"Second_Column"'. Basically:
it's a combination of a postgres issue and his code. I
think. :)

Cris

> 
> > ID:               28994
> >  User updated by:  bas at vanklinkenbergsoftware
> dot nl
> >  Reported By:      bas at vanklinkenbergsoftware
> dot nl
> >  Status:           Open
> >  Bug Type:         Documentation problem
> >  Operating System: N/A
> >  PHP Version:      4.3.7
> >  New Comment:
> > 
> > All right, some more investigation shows me that
> when using lower case
> > column names, all works well. When using mixed
> case column names, using
> > a string as the third argument generates the 'Bad
> Column Offset' error.
> > See code snippet below. Note that fieldnames are
> correctly retrieved
> > with pg_field_name().
> > 
> >     $db_conn = pg_connect("host = localhost port =
> 5432 dbname = test
> > user = test password = test");
> >     $result = pg_query($db_conn, 'SELECT * FROM
> test');
> >     echo "table column index 0, has a lower case
> name, works
> > fine:<br>\n";
> >     $fieldname = pg_field_name($result, 0);
> >     echo "fieldname: $fieldname <br>\n";
> >     $fieldlength = pg_field_prtlen($result, 0, 0);
> >     echo "fieldlength: $fieldlength <br>\n";
> >     $fieldlength2 = pg_field_prtlen($result, 0,
> $fieldname);
> >     echo "fieldlength: $fieldlength2 <br>\n";
> > 
> >     echo '<br>table column index 1, has a mixed
> case name, generates
> > e_notice and empty fieldlength:<br>\n';
> >     $fieldname = pg_field_name($result, 1);
> >     echo "fieldname: $fieldname <br>\n";
> >     $fieldlength3 = pg_field_prtlen($result, 0,
> 1);
> >     echo "fieldlength: $fieldlength3 <br>\n";
> >     $fieldlength4 = pg_field_prtlen($result, 0,
> $fieldname);
> >     echo "fieldlength: $fieldlength4 <br>\n";
> > 
> > You can test the code above at this url:
> > http://212.61.21.72/test/pg_field_prtlen_test.php
> > 
> > The database table used in the above code looks
> like this:
> > ==============
> > Welcome to psql 7.3.4-RH, the PostgreSQL
> interactive terminal.
> > 
> > You are now connected to database test as user
> test.
> > test=> select * from test;
> >  first_column | Second_Column
> > --------------+----------------
> >             1 | some text
> >             2 | some more text
> > (2 rows)
> > 
> > test=>
> > ============
> > 
> > Appearantly it looks like there are two problems:
> the documentation
> > problem, where the possibility to pass an int as
> the third argument is
> > not documented, and the error that occurs when
> using mixed case column
> > names. Should I file the latter as a separate bug?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Bas
> > 
> > 
> > Previous Comments:
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > [2004-07-02 23:17:01] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > What I can see in the sources is that the proto
> is:
> > 
> > int pg_field_prtlen(resource result, [int row,]
> mixed
> > field_name_or_number
> > 
> > 
> > Row is optional and the last parameter can be
> either a string or an
> > integer. If it's passed as string, it is
> recongnised as the field name,
> > otherwise as the field number.
> > 
> > I've never used PostgreSQL, so can you or somebody
> confirm if the
> > function is behaving as I've stated, please??
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Nuno
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > [2004-07-02 15:50:02] bas at
> vanklinkenbergsoftware dot nl
> > 
> > Description:
> > ------------
> > In the online documentation for pg_field_prtlen,
> the function 
> > arguments are described as follows:
> > 
> > int pg_field_prtlen (resource result, int
> row_number, string
> > field_name)
> > 
> > but actually it should be:
> > 
> > int pg_field_prtlen (resource result, int
> row_number, int
> > column_number)
> > 
> > (The third argument should be column number
> instead of field name).
> > When using pg_field_prtlen as stated in the online
> documentation, a
> > 'Bad Column Offset' error is generated.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Edit this bug report at
> http://bugs.php.net/?id=28994&edit=1
> 
> -- 
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> 
>  


        
        
                
___________________________________________________________ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - 
sooooo many all-new ways to express yourself http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to