On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:59:40 +0200 (IST), Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > Why would anyone need this? if __construct() contains php5-only > syntax, it won't work anyway on php4.
I just image the case of a class with some optimizations for php5, but with a fallback implementation of some of its features for php4 too, which get triggered by the constructor. Anyway, I agree this is a weak argument, there may be other ways to do the same thing. > If it contains something that works in php4 > - why do you need separate constructor? if the php4-way of naming a constructor is not going to be deprecated, then I don't. This is my main worry. -- Lorenzo -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
