Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 17:27 11/02/2004, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Arguments for this have been gone over in the past and generaly 'security issues' and 'memory usage' are used as reasons to not change the way it works, both being generaly bogus. The only reason it isn't fixed is reliance on php.ini.
Sorry Shane, but that's just wrong, and I am doing my best to avoid using more powerful words :)
More powerful words for what reason? That's just lame.
Well, when you say that what I said in the past is bogus, I don't particularly enjoy reading that. I think that was pretty lame, so I refrained from doing the same and just said that it was on the tip of my tongue...
By the way - dl() is trivial to implement if we were to go down your path, and make dl()'s persist forever. However, that's exactly where the problem is coming from - it completely doesn't fit the theme of PHP (not to mention the security and resource usage concerns, which are completely valid, but secondary). It wouldn't have helped in the various cases that were brought up on internals@ today and in the past, because they originated mostly in users' abilities to load modules dynamically AND in an isolated manner, like everything else in PHP, not just being able to load modules outside of php.ini. I know you're in a personal vendetta against php.ini, but I don't think most people care about it that much...
Zeev
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
