On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote: > > > Well we do tend to be verbose in PHP even when it's non-standard. > > I'd really prefer cgi.non_parsing_headers. > > It should be common_gateway_interface.non_parsing_headers then...
Yeah, nph is pretty much as well-known as cgi. The people who are affected by this will all know and understand "nph".
I wouldn't say nph is nearly as well known as CGI, but either way, is there any reason not to go with something more verbose? I do agree that most people who need nph would know what it is, but even for people that do, a more verbose name doesn't reduce readability (as long as we don't get carried away with common_gateway_interface...).
It's no biggy either way, but I do think that we're better off using no_header_parsing or something like that.
Zeev
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
