At 08:08 PM 1/11/2004 +0100, DvDmanDT wrote:
For me it's not really a problem, but that's in my case... Lots of ppl obviously wants both of them... So.. If it's only about naming the parameter might be worth to think about.. Also, what bumps do you expect to hit?
-- // DvDmanDT MSN: dvdmandt€hotmail.com Mail: dvdmandt€telia.com "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Migration from PHP 4 to PHP 5 should be quite easy. I don't think we should > get into trying to make them co-exist. We might hit quite a few bumps on > the way. > I think that until you are ready to completely migrate, running PHP 5 as a > CGI is a decent solution. > > Andi > > At 01:09 AM 1/11/2004 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >In a message dated 1/11/2004 12:12:18 AM Eastern Standard Time, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >.. There really should be another configure parameter which names all > >non-language stuff php5 instead of php... Like x-httpd-php5, php5_gd2.dll > >and so on.. > >I'm +1 for that, if it matters. > > > >And that seems to be the only thing that's holding it back from working... > >the PHP5 module automatically takes over the x-httpd-php type, while the CGI > >version has to be specified and can be specified to only use x-httpd-php5 > >(which > >is what it does now). > > > >Gordon Hemsley
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
