On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Lukas Smith wrote:
> > From: Sascha Schumann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 4:39 PM
>
> > > The fact that PEAR has a serious problem extending non studlyCap objects
> > is
> > > probably something a lot of people in PHP core don't care about.
> >
> > Please elaborate.
>
> Well if I extend a class that doesnt use studlyCaps, yet the PEAR CS
> requires that I use studlyCaps, then I have a problem. Essentially I can
> only wrap and not extend. I guess you can say this is our problem however,
> since we could also choose to loosen our CS to allow underscores.
Agreed.
> I don't
> feel that having to ways in there is the way to go. I prefer to stay with
> one which results in the fewest breaks with the outside world.
You apparently live in an alternative "outside world". In
mine, there are 99% C bindings where studlyCaps virtually do
not exist.
- Sascha
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
