I must be thick. I don't quite understand how the source relates to what is described in the .png. Take for example the following from the api.c file:
I talked this over with Marcus. The FE/FALIAS pairs are designed to avoid namespace conflicts with the other (not yet existent) reflection classes. I better solution will be to write a new macro that allows ZEND_FUNCTION(php_function_getstartline) to be registered as a class method directly as 'getstartline). I'll modify my patch shortly. If something like that exists already, a pointer to it would be swell.
Otherwise the functions work as follows:
<?php
/**
Doc comment goes here
*/
function counter() {
static $i = 0;
return $i++;
}$obj = new PHP_Function("counter");
print $obj->getName()." was decared in ".$obj->getFileName()." starting at ".$obj->getStartLine().
"and ending at ".$obj->getEndline."\n";
print "Here is what it's docs have to say: "$obj->getDocComment(). "\n";
if($statics = $obj->staticVariables()) {
print $obj->getName()." has the following static variables:\n".print_r($statics);
}
print $obj->invoke();
Something like that.
static zend_function_entry php_function_functions[] = { ZEND_FE(php_function, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_isinternal, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(isinternal, php_function_isinternal, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_isuserdefined, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(isuserdefined, php_function_isinternal, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getname, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getname, php_function_getname, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getfilename, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getfilename, php_function_getfilename, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getstartline, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getstartline, php_function_getstartline, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getendline, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getendline, php_function_getendline, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getdoccomment, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getdoccomment, php_function_getdoccomment, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_getstaticvariables, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(getstaticvariables, php_function_getstaticvariables, NULL) ZEND_FE(php_function_invoke, NULL) ZEND_FALIAS(invoke, php_function_invoke, NULL) {NULL, NULL, NULL}
Are these functions meant to be called by the user? They are *pretty* ugly.
Can you show a small piece of example code on how this reflection API is supposed to be used?
Once we make sure it looks good to everyone I have no problem with you commiting your work.
Andi
At 03:18 PM 29/6/2003 -0400, George Schlossnagle wrote:Here is a first implementation of the reflection api, for functions (class PHP_Function in you diagram)
http://www.schlossnagle.org/~george/php/reflection.diff http://www.schlossnagle.org/~george/php/zend_reflection_api.c http://www.schlossnagle.org/~george/php/zend_reflection_api.h
Comments? Thoughts? George
On Wednesday, June 18, 2003, at 12:53 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/stuff/reflection.png
I refactored it a bit:
http://www.sebastian-bergmann.de/stuff/reflection-update.png
IMHO it is essential that PHP_Field and PHP_Method implement a
common interface (like their counterparts from java.lang.reflect do)
to ease iterating through a class's members, for instance.
-- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
http://www.professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
-- PHP 5 Development Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- George Schlossnagle -- Principal Consultant -- OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- +1.410.872.4910 x202 -- 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-- George Schlossnagle -- Principal Consultant -- OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc. -- +1.410.872.4910 x202 -- 1024D/1100A5A0 1370 F70A 9365 96C9 2F5E 56C2 B2B9 262F 1100 A5A0
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
