On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 12:16:16PM -0700, Brad LaFountain wrote: > Shane doesn't like to play with the PECL one ;) > (seems like nor do I, its been a while) > - Brad
Well since the extensions are now 'in' PECL, doesn't that mean the SOAP extension there could/would be the PHP SOAP extension? If that's the case, is there something wrong with it that we can fix for php5? Or is it a lost cause. (no long winded explainations needed since this isn't the pear list) > --- Jeraimee Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 10:03:49AM -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote: > > > Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > > > With all this new fancy XML support in PHP 5 -- what about SOAP? > > > I plan on implementing a new soap library based on top of simplexml, but > > > will not be able to start serious work on it until august. The new > > > library would be usable with almost no PHP code, but will still have > > > supporting functionality written in PHP. I would say the new library > > > would be at least 80% smaller, most code being to support addon > > > functionality and different transports. > > > > How's this going to interact (if any) with the supposed SOAP module > > already in PECL? > > > > (I was just about to start looking at it for some extension and use) -- Jeraimee -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
