On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 22:12:22 +0200
Magnus Maatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 14:06:29 -0500
> "Mike Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 30 Mar 2003, Mike Robinson wrote:
> > > > ATM, in_array() takes 2 args and 1 parameter. Adding 1 more
> > > > wouldn't hurt, doesn't break BC, and provides some added
> > > > usefulness.
> > >
> > > And slows down the inner loop of searching.
> >
> > Indeed, but it's always a point of contention; the tradeoffs
> > between performance and feature set. Seems to me that in_array()
> > no matter was is going to be a bit of a performance hound, so
> > adding some usefulness isn't going to be that much of a headache.
> > But if in your opinion the tradeoff is too profound leave it
> > out, by all means. My point was that of usefulness. I'll leave
> > the weighting against performance of such to the experts.
>
Andrei: -1
Ilia: -1
Derick: -1
Georg: -1
Marcus: +0
Moriyoshi: -1
====================
Total: -5
So I marked it: Won't Fix
Good experience thou =)
/Magnus
--
The trouble with computers is that they do what you tell them, not what
you want.
-- D. Cohen
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
