On Mon, 2025-06-09 at 09:25 -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > Drivers that are using ops lock and don't depend on RTNL lock > still need to manage it because udp_tunnel's RTNL dependency. > Introduce new udp_tunnel_nic_lock and use it instead of > rtnl_lock. Drop non-UDP_TUNNEL_NIC_INFO_MAY_SLEEP mode from > udp_tunnel infra (udp_tunnel_nic_device_sync_work needs to > grab udp_tunnel_nic_lock mutex and might sleep). > > Cc: Michael Chan <[email protected]> > Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <[email protected]>
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] udp_tunnel:... Stanislav Fomichev
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] udp_tu... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 1/4... Cosmin Ratiu
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: r... Stanislav Fomichev
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] netdev... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 3/4... Loktionov, Aleksandr
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] Revert... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] ud... Jakub Kicinski
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2 0/4... Stanislav Fomichev
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next v2... Jakub Kicinski
