čt 17. 4. 2025 v 19:52 odesílatel Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]> napsal: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2025 5:13 PM > > To: Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]> > > Cc: Jaroslav Pulchart <[email protected]>; Kitszel, Przemyslaw > > <[email protected]>; Damato, Joe <[email protected]>; > > intel-wired- > > [email protected]; [email protected]; Nguyen, Anthony L > > <[email protected]>; Igor Raits <[email protected]>; Daniel Secik > > <[email protected]>; Zdenek Pesek <[email protected]>; > > Dumazet, Eric <[email protected]>; Martin Karsten > > <[email protected]>; Zaki, Ahmed <[email protected]>; Czapnik, > > Lukasz <[email protected]>; Michal Swiatkowski > > <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] Increased memory usage on NUMA nodes with ICE > > driver after upgrade to 6.13.y (regression in commit 492a044508ad) > > > > On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 22:57:10 +0000 Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > > > > And you're reverting just and exactly 492a044508ad13 ? > > > > > The memory for persistent config is allocated in alloc_netdev_mqs() > > > > > unconditionally. I'm lost as to how this commit could make any > > > > > difference :( > > > > > > > > Yes, reverted the 492a044508ad13. > > > > > > Struct napi_config *is* 1056 bytes > > > > You're probably looking at 6.15-rcX kernels. Yes, the affinity mask > > can be large depending on the kernel config. But report is for 6.13, > > AFAIU. In 6.13 and 6.14 napi_config was tiny. > > Regardless, it should still be ~64KB even in that case which is a far cry > from eating all available memory. Something else must be going on.... > > Thanks, > Jake
Hello Some observation, this "problem" still exists with the latest 6.14.y and there must be multiple issues, the memory utilization is slowly going down, from 3GB to 100MB in 10-20days. at home NUMA nodes where intel x810 NIC are (looks like some memory leak related to networking). So without the revert the kawadX usage is observed asap like till 1-2d, with revert of mentioned commit kswadX starts to consume resources later like in ~10d-20d later. It is almost impossible to use servers with Intel X810 cards (ice driver) with recent linux kernels. Were you able to reproduce the memory problems in your testbed? Best, Jaroslav
