On 4/8/2025 3:31 AM, Milena Olech wrote: > Add Rx timestamp function when the Rx timestamp value is read directly > from the Rx descriptor. In order to extend the Rx timestamp value to 64 > bit in hot path, the PHC time is cached in the receive groups. > Add supported Rx timestamp modes. > > Signed-off-by: Milena Olech <milena.ol...@intel.com> > Tested-by: YiFei Zhu <zhuyi...@google.com> > Tested-by: Mina Almasry <almasrym...@google.com> > Tested-by: Samuel Salin <samuel.sa...@intel.com> > --- Besides my question in 10/11 about the timestamp extension logic, this looks ok to me. Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 05/... Jacob Keller
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 07/11] idpf: add cro... Milena Olech
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 09/11] idpf: add Tx ... Milena Olech
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 09/11] idpf... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 09/11] ... Olech, Milena
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 09/... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next... Olech, Milena
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl... Keller, Jacob E
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 11/11] idpf: add sup... Milena Olech
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 11/11] idpf... Jacob Keller
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 10/11] idpf: add Tx ... Milena Olech
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 10/11] idpf... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 10/11] ... Olech, Milena
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 06/11] idpf: add mai... Milena Olech
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 06/11] idpf... Jacob Keller
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 06/11] ... Olech, Milena
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 06/11] idpf... Jacob Keller
- [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 08/11] idpf: add PTP... Milena Olech
- Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v10 iwl-next 01/11] idpf: cha... Jacob Keller