On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:53:26 -0500 Joe Damato wrote: > > No strong preference. If rtnl_lock is not causing any issues > > in this driver, the we can merge as is. I haven't followed > > the past discussions, tho. > > Don't mean to side-track this thread, but does this mean you've > changed your mind on the previous virtio_net thread [1] ? > > Or maybe I'm just misreading your response there? And instead I > could re-spin the virtio_net but dropping the first patch and > dealing with RTNL in the code like this series is doing? > > For some reason I was under the impression that the virtio_net > series and others like it (like this igb series) were being held > back until locking work Stanislav is doing is done. > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250127133756.413ef...@kernel.org/
Yes, you can probably respin v1. Let's not block this.
