On 1/23/25 11:51, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:45:36AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
Idea behind having ice_rx_buf::act was to simplify and speed up the Rx
data path by walking through buffers that were representing cleaned HW
Rx descriptors. Since it caused us a major headache recently and we
rolled back to old approach that 'puts' Rx buffers right after running
XDP prog/creating skb, this is useless now and should be removed.

Get rid of ice_rx_buf::act and related logic. We still need to take care
of a corner case where XDP program releases a particular fragment.

Make ice_run_xdp() to return its result and use it within
ice_put_rx_mbuf().

Fixes: 2fba7dc5157b ("ice: Add support for XDP multi-buffer on Rx side")
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kits...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkow...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c     | 61 +++++++++++--------
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h     |  1 -
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.h | 43 -------------
  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c

...

@@ -1139,23 +1136,27 @@ ice_put_rx_buf(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, struct 
ice_rx_buf *rx_buf)
   * returned by XDP program;
   */
  static void ice_put_rx_mbuf(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
-                           u32 *xdp_xmit, u32 ntc)
+                           u32 *xdp_xmit, u32 ntc, u32 verdict)

Hi Marciej,

Sorry, there is one more Kernel doc nit. As reported by the Kernel Test
Robot, verdict should be added to the Kernel doc for this function.

Yeah that is embarrassing. I have now included

./scripts/kernel-doc -none $FILE

to my pre-upstreaming checks so that it won't be happening again...
(or is there a way to run the kernel-doc against patch itself?)

I made a script that checks if there are any new kdoc issues on HEAD
vs branch provided:
https://github.com/pkitszel/small/blob/master/check-kdoc.sh




With that addressed feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <ho...@kernel.org>

Thanks! Will include them in v5.


...

Reply via email to