>-----Original Message-----
>From: Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkow...@intel.com> 
>Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 5:31 PM
>To: Kwapulinski, Piotr <piotr.kwapulin...@intel.com>
>Cc: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; net...@vger.kernel.org; 
>dan.carpen...@linaro.org; yuehaib...@huawei.com; Kitszel, Przemyslaw 
><przemyslaw.kits...@intel.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] ixgbe: Fix possible skb NULL pointer dereference
>
>On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Piotr Kwapulinski wrote:
>> Check both skb NULL pointer dereference and error in ixgbe_put_rx_buffer().
>
>Hi Piotr,
Hi Maciej,

>
>is this only theoretical or have you encountered any system panic? If so 
>please include the splat so that reviewers will be able to understand the 
>context of the fix.
No kernel panic or stack trace.

>
>Generally after looking up the commit pointed by fixes tag it seems that we 
>got rid of IS_ERR(skb) logic and forgot to address this part of code.
Right.

>
>If that is correct then you should provide a better explanation in your commit 
>message.
Will provide,
Thank you,
Piotr

>
>> 
>> Fixes: c824125cbb18 ("ixgbe: Fix passing 0 to ERR_PTR in 
>> ixgbe_run_xdp()")
>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Kwapulinski <piotr.kwapulin...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 9 +++++----
>>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c 
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> index 7236f20..c682c3d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
>> @@ -2098,14 +2098,14 @@ static struct ixgbe_rx_buffer 
>> *ixgbe_get_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
>>  
>>  static void ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
>>                              struct ixgbe_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
>> -                            struct sk_buff *skb,
>> -                            int rx_buffer_pgcnt)
>> +                            struct sk_buff *skb, int rx_buffer_pgcnt,
>> +                            int xdp_res)
>>  {
>>      if (ixgbe_can_reuse_rx_page(rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt)) {
>>              /* hand second half of page back to the ring */
>>              ixgbe_reuse_rx_page(rx_ring, rx_buffer);
>>      } else {
>> -            if (!IS_ERR(skb) && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
>> +            if (skb && !xdp_res && IXGBE_CB(skb)->dma == rx_buffer->dma) {
>>                      /* the page has been released from the ring */
>>                      IXGBE_CB(skb)->page_released = true;
>>              } else {
>> @@ -2415,7 +2415,8 @@ static int ixgbe_clean_rx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector 
>> *q_vector,
>>                      break;
>>              }
>>  
>> -            ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt);
>> +            ixgbe_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, rx_buffer_pgcnt,
>> +                                xdp_res);
>>              cleaned_count++;
>>  
>>              /* place incomplete frames back on ring for completion */
>> --
>> 2.43.0

Reply via email to