Greetings: While working on an RFC which adds fields to napi_struct [1], I got a warning from the kernel test robot about tripping an assertion in idpf which seems to hardcode the size of napi_struct. The assertion was triggered after applying patch 3 from the RFC [2].
I'm submitting this as an RFC so the Intel folks have time to take a look and request changes, but I plan to submit this next week when net-next reopens. I did not want to the include this change in my RFC v4 because I wanted to keep the review of that RFC focused on the in core work instead, so I was hoping Intel would be OK to merge this (or a change which accomplishes the same thing). Please note: I do not have this hardware and thus have only compile tested this. Thanks, Joe [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912100738.16567-1-jdam...@fastly.com/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240912100738.16567-6-jdam...@fastly.com/ Joe Damato (1): idpf: Don't hard code napi_struct size drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.h | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1
