On 9/11/24 00:03, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 00:10:08 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
+       if (adapter->netdev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED) {
+               mutex_lock(&adapter->netdev->lock);
+               devlock = true;
+       }

This leads to a false positive in cocci.

Any concerns about moving the mutex_init() / _destroy() into
alloc_netdev_mqs() / free_netdev()?  I guess one could argue
that narrower scope of the lock being valid may help catching
errors, but I think we'll instead end up with more checks like
the above sprinkled around than bugs caught?

I considered moving the locking initialization and shutdown, but I kept there for symmetry with the rss_lock. I'll move the init/destroy in the next revision.

Thanks,

Paolo

Reply via email to