> My colleague, Kohei, tested the patch with a real hardware and will provide
> his
> Tested-by shortly.
I have tested the patch using my physical hardware, an Intel Ethernet
controller I219-V. The device was properly attached by the e1000e driver and
functioned correctly. The test was performed on a custom kernel based on
kernel-core-6.10.6-200.fc40.x86_64.
The PCI device is identified as an Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (17)
I219-V (rev 11), with vendor ID 0x8086 and device ID 0x1a1d. This device ID
matches the E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_ADP_I219_V17 definition in the e1000e driver code.
```
$ lspci | grep -i ethernet
00:1f.6 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Ethernet Connection (17) I219-V
(rev 11)
$ cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:00:1f.6/{vendor,device}
0x8086
0x1a1d
$ grep -ri 0x1a1d
~/ghq/github.com/torvalds/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e
/home/kohei/ghq/github.com/torvalds/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/hw.h:#define
E1000_DEV_ID_PCH_ADP_I219_V17 0x1A1D
```
So this testing confirms that the patch does not introduce any regressions for
this specific hardware configuration.
Tested-by: Kohei Enju <en...@amazon.com>
Thanks!
