Thank you for the review! I've sent out another patch that hopefully addresses the comments.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 3:26 PM Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@intel.com> wrote: > > Daiwei Li <daiwe...@google.com> writes: > > > 82580 NICs have a hardware bug that makes it > > necessary to write into the TSICR (TimeSync Interrupt Cause) register > > to clear it: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cdcb8be0.1ec2c%25matthew.v...@intel.com/ > > > > Add a conditional so only for 82580 we write into the TSICR register, > > so we don't risk losing events for other models. > > Please add some information in the commit message about how to reproduce > the issue, as Paul suggested. > > > > > This (partially) reverts commit ee14cc9ea19b ("igb: Fix missing time sync > > events"). > > > > Fixes: ee14cc9ea19b ("igb: Fix missing time sync events") > > Closes: > > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/CAN0jFd1kO0MMtOh8N2Ztxn6f7vvDKp2h507sMryobkBKe=xk=w...@mail.gmail.com/ > > Tested-by: Daiwei Li <daiwe...@google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daiwei Li <daiwe...@google.com> > > --- > > > > @Vinicius Gomes, this is my first time submitting a Linux kernel patch, > > so apologies if I missed any part of the procedure (e.g. this is > > currently on top of 6.7.12, the kernel I am running; should I be > > rebasing on inline?). Also, is there any way to annotate the patch > > to give you credit for the original change? > > Your submission format looks fine. Just a couple details: > - No need for setting in-reply-to (or something like it); > > - For this particular patch, you got lucky and it applies cleanly > against current tip, but for future submissions, for intel-wired-lan > and patches intended for the stable tree, please rebase against: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tnguy/net-queue.git/ > > For credits, you can add something like: > > Suggested-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.go...@intel.com> > > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c > > index ada42ba63549..1210ddc5d81e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c > > @@ -6986,6 +6986,16 @@ static void igb_tsync_interrupt(struct igb_adapter > > *adapter) > > struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw; > > u32 tsicr = rd32(E1000_TSICR); > > struct ptp_clock_event event; > > + const u32 mask = (TSINTR_SYS_WRAP | E1000_TSICR_TXTS | > > + TSINTR_TT0 | TSINTR_TT1 | > > + TSINTR_AUTT0 | TSINTR_AUTT1); > > + > > Please move the declaration of 'mask' up, to follow the convention, the > "reverse christmas tree" rule. Or separate the attribution from the > declaration. > > > + if (hw->mac.type == e1000_82580) { > > + /* 82580 has a hardware bug that requires a explicit > > And as pointed by Paul, "*an* explicit". > > > + * write to clear the TimeSync interrupt cause. > > + */ > > + wr32(E1000_TSICR, tsicr & mask); > > + } > > > > if (tsicr & TSINTR_SYS_WRAP) { > > event.type = PTP_CLOCK_PPS; > > -- > > 2.46.0.76.ge559c4bf1a-goog > > > > -- > Vinicius -- Daiwei Li Software Engineer Mobile: 415-736-8670 waymo.com
