Hi Christopher, On Aug 6 17:30, christopher.s.h...@intel.com wrote: > From: Christopher S M Hall <christopher.s.h...@intel.com> > > Add a mutex around the PTM transaction to prevent multiple transactors > > Multiple processes try to initiate a PTM transaction, one or all may > fail. This can be reproduced by running two instances of the > following:
I saw a former version of the patch which additionally added a mutex lock/unlock in igc_ptp_reset() just before calling igc_ptm_trigger(). Is it safe to skip that? igc_ptp_reset() is called from igc_reset() which in turn is called from quite a few places. Thanks, Corinna
