On Tue, 28 May 2024 15:48:45 +0200 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Currently, idpf uses the following model for the header buffers:
>
> * buffers are allocated via dma_alloc_coherent();
> * when receiving, napi_alloc_skb() is called and then the header is
> copied to the newly allocated linear part.
>
> This is far from optimal as DMA coherent zone is slow on many systems
> and memcpy() neutralizes the idea and benefits of the header split. Not
> speaking of that XDP can't be run on DMA coherent buffers, but at the
> same time the idea of allocating an skb to run XDP program is ill.
> Instead, use libeth to create page_pools for the header buffers, allocate
> them dynamically and then build an skb via napi_build_skb() around them
> with no memory copy. With one exception...
> When you enable header split, you except you'll always have a separate
accept
> header buffer, so that you could reserve headroom and tailroom only
> there and then use full buffers for the data. For example, this is how
> TCP zerocopy works -- you have to have the payload aligned to PAGE_SIZE.
> The current hardware running idpf does *not* guarantee that you'll
> always have headers placed separately. For example, on my setup, even
> ICMP packets are written as one piece to the data buffers. You can't
> build a valid skb around a data buffer in this case.
> To not complicate things and not lose TCP zerocopy etc., when such thing
> happens, use the empty header buffer and pull either full frame (if it's
> short) or the Ethernet header there and build an skb around it. GRO
> layer will pull more from the data buffer later. This W/A will hopefully
> be removed one day.
Hopefully soon, cause it will prevent you from mapping data buffers to
user space or using DMABUF memory :(
