On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 08:27:15AM CET, michal.swiatkow...@linux.intel.com wrote: > >From: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczyn...@intel.com> > > > >Instead of only registering devlink port by the ice driver itself, > >let PF driver only register port representor for a given subfunction. > >Then, aux driver is supposed to register its own devlink instance and > >register virtual devlink port. > > > >Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.dre...@intel.com> > >Signed-off-by: Piotr Raczynski <piotr.raczyn...@intel.com> > >Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkow...@linux.intel.com> > >--- > > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.c | 52 ++++- > > .../intel/ice/devlink/ice_devlink_port.h | 6 + > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.c | 28 ++- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_devlink.h | 3 + > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c | 9 + > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.c | 214 ++++++++++++++++-- > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_sf_eth.h | 21 ++ > > 7 files changed, 302 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > > Could you please split this. I see that you can push out 1-3 patches as > preparation.
Do you mean 1-3 patchses from this patch, or from whole patchset? I mean, do you want to split the patchset to two patchsets? (by splitting patch from the patchset I will have more than netdev maximum; 15 I think). Thanks, Michal
