On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:29:38 +0100 Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > >> I think that's a bad bisect. There is no reason I could understand for > >> that change to cause a continuous or large leak, it really doesn't make > >> any sense. Reverting it consistently helps? You're not just rewinding > >> the tree back to that point, right? just running 6.6.9 without that > >> patch? (sorry for being pedantic, just trying to be certain) > > > > Reverting just the single bisected commit continuously helps for >= > > 6.6.9 and as well for current 6.7. > > We cannot use any new linux kernel without reverting it due to this > > extra memory utilization. > > Quick query: what's the status wrt to this regression? Looks like > nothing happened in the past week.
Is someone working on this? Indeed the commit in question looks harmless but can't argue with the revert helping :S
