On 09.01.24 07:31, D, Lakshmi Sowjanya wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> >> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 8:50 PM >> To: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjany...@intel.com> >> Cc: t...@linutronix.de; jstu...@google.com; giome...@enneenne.com; >> cor...@lwn.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org; >> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired- >> l...@lists.osuosl.org; Dong, Eddie <eddie.d...@intel.com>; Hall, Christopher >> S >> <christopher.s.h...@intel.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse >> <jesse.brandeb...@intel.com>; da...@davemloft.net; >> alexandre.tor...@foss.st.com; joab...@synopsys.com; >> mcoquelin.st...@gmail.com; pe...@perex.cz; linux-so...@vger.kernel.org; >> Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.ngu...@intel.com>; N, Pandith >> <pandit...@intel.com>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa >> <mallikarjunappa.sanganna...@intel.com>; T R, Thejesh Reddy >> <thejesh.reddy....@intel.com> >> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] Add support for Intel PPS Generator >> [...] >> At some point you should announce v1 of the series. RFC is usually being >> neglected by many (busy) maintainers. > > This patch series is dependent on > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231215220612.173603-2-peter.hil...@opensynergy.com/T/ > which is RFC.
So I understand my dependency series being RFC prevents the PPS series from dropping the RFC tag (correct me if I am wrong). I plan to send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series next. So far I think there will only be polishing changes. Due to testing being some effort, I wanted to test and send it together with some other series. But if this is blocking the PPS series, I think I could send out a non-RFC version of the dependency series earlier (by the end of January?). Please let me know what would align with the PPS series timeline. Regards, Peter > > Regards, > Sowjanya >> >> -- >> With Best Regards, >> Andy Shevchenko >> >
