From: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szy...@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:04:01 +0100
>
>
> On 15.12.2023 17:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 11:11:23 +0100 Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>>> Ping? :s
>>> Or should we resubmit?
>>
>> Can you wait for next merge window instead?
>> We're getting flooded with patches as everyone seemingly tries to get
>> their own (i.e. the most important!) work merged before the end of
>> the year. The set of PRs from the bitmap tree which Linus decided
>> not to pull is not empty. So we'd have to go figure out what's exactly
>> is in that branch we're supposed to pull, and whether it's fine.
>> It probably is, but you see, this is a problem which can be solved by
>> waiting, and letting Linus pull it himself. While the 150 patches we're
>> getting a day now have to be looked at.
>
> Let's wait to the next window then.
Hey Yury,
Given that PFCP will be resent in the next window...
Your "boys" tree is in fact self-contained -- those are mostly
optimizations and cleanups, and for the new API -- bitmap_{read,write}()
-- it has internal users (after "bitmap: make bitmap_{get,set}_value8()
use bitmap_{read,write}()"). IOW, I don't see a reason for not merging
it into your main for-next tree (this week :p).
What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Marcin
Thanks,
Olek
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
