On Mon, 2023-12-04 at 13:28 -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>
> Where do you we go from here? Is the patch obviously good/safe, or do we
> need to narrow things down/test some more?
>
Well, I was hoping that
(a) ethtool folks / Jakub would comment if this makes sense, but I
don't see a good reason to do things the other way around (other
than "code is simpler"); and
(b) Intel wired folks could help out with getting the patch across the
finish line, seeing how their driver needs it :) I think the dev
get/put needs to use the newer API, but I didn't immediately see
how that works locally in a function without an allocated tracker
johannes
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
