On 11/29/23 11:26, Sokolowski, Jan wrote:
On 11/20/2023 3:27 AM, Jan Sokolowski wrote:
It was found that this statistic is incorrectly reported
by HW and thus, useless.

Remove it.
Is there any further information about what is reported incorrectly? Is
rx_length_errors part of netdev stats and standardized? Does HW fail to
report some packets or does it report packets which don't have an issue?
Great questions

It's a part of visible stats, standardized.
Please add that info into commit message of v2, and CC netdev.

Perhaps one could ask if it would be better to always-report-zero as
a value of that, standardized, stat. But if we could just remove it,
it's better.

According to the bug report, HW was misreporting packets that did not have any 
issues.

I mean the hardware does *something*, so I think it would be good to
have an understanding of how this differs from what we expected when
proposing to remove it.

Thanks,
Jake
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

Reply via email to