From: Jason Xing <kernelx...@tencent.com>

Since we never support this feature for I40E driver, we don't have to
display the value when using 'ethtool -c eth0'.

Before this patch applied, the rx-frames-irq is 256 which is consistent
with tx-frames-irq. Apparently it could mislead users.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelx...@tencent.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
index eb9a7b32af73..2a0a12a79aa3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c
@@ -2895,7 +2895,6 @@ static int __i40e_get_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
        struct i40e_vsi *vsi = np->vsi;
 
        ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq = vsi->work_limit;
-       ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq = vsi->work_limit;
 
        /* rx and tx usecs has per queue value. If user doesn't specify the
         * queue, return queue 0's value to represent.
@@ -3029,7 +3028,7 @@ static int __i40e_set_coalesce(struct net_device *netdev,
        struct i40e_pf *pf = vsi->back;
        int i;
 
-       if (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq || ec->rx_max_coalesced_frames_irq)
+       if (ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq)
                vsi->work_limit = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames_irq;
 
        if (queue < 0) {
-- 
2.37.3

_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan

Reply via email to