According to BSpec, it's the "core CPUs" that need the code, which
means SKL and KBL, but not BXT.
I don't have a KBL to test this patch on it.
v2: Only SKL should have I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 5b2eb7a..1968672 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2887,8 +2887,14 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane *plane)
static bool
intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
{
- return IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
- dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
+ if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv))
+ return true;
+
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
+ dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
/*
@@ -2926,7 +2932,7 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
* don't actually have an SAGV.
*/
- if (ret == -ENXIO) {
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && ret == -ENXIO) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
return 0;
@@ -2980,7 +2986,7 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
* Some skl systems, pre-release machines in particular,
* don't actually have an SAGV.
*/
- if (result == -ENXIO) {
+ if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && result == -ENXIO) {
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n");
dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED;
return 0;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
