On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:45:10AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On su, 2016-08-28 at 21:46 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Userspace is faced with a dilemma. The kernel requires implicit fencing > > to manage resource usage (we always must wait for the GPU to finish > > before releasing its PTE) and for third parties. However, userspace may > > wish to avoid this serialisation if it is either using explicit fencing > > between parties and wants more fine-grained access to buffers (e.g. it > > may partition the buffer between uses and track fences on ranges rather > > than the implicit fences tracking the whole object). To whit, userspace > > s/whit/with/?
It was meant to be whit, but apparently used incorrectly - "to whit" doesn't mean quite what I thought it meant. s//It follows that/ -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
