Hi Tom, [auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next] [also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc3 next-20160819] [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] [Suggest to use git(>=2.9.0) format-patch --base=<commit> (or --base=auto for convenience) to record what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was built on] [Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Sagar-Arun-Kamble/drm-i915-slpc-Add-enable_slpc-module-parameter/20160820-131710 base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next config: x86_64-randconfig-x015-201633 (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705 reproduce: # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=x86_64 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c: In function 'sanitize_slpc_option': >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c:139:22: error: implicit declaration >> of function 'HAS_SLPC' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] i915.enable_slpc = HAS_SLPC(dev); ^~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/HAS_SLPC +139 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c 133 } 134 135 static void sanitize_slpc_option(struct drm_device *dev) 136 { 137 /* Handle default case */ 138 if (i915.enable_slpc < 0) > 139 i915.enable_slpc = HAS_SLPC(dev); 140 141 /* slpc requires hardware support and compatible firmware */ 142 if (!HAS_SLPC(dev)) --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
.config.gz
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
