On 8/19/2016 11:48 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:13:14PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
+static int i915_guc_log_control_get(void *data, u64 *val)
+{
+       struct drm_device *dev = data;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+
+       if (!dev_priv->guc.log.vma)
+               return -EINVAL;

return -ENODEV;
Fine will change the return code.

+
+       *val = i915.guc_log_level;
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int i915_guc_log_control_set(void *data, u64 val)
+{
+       struct drm_device *dev = data;
+       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+       int ret;

if (!dev_priv->guc.log.vma)
        return -ENODEV;

you don't need struct_mutex to check for its existence.

Fine will lock the struct_mutex after the NULL vma check.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to