On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 02:13:07PM +0530, akash.g...@intel.com wrote:
> static void *guc_get_write_buffer(struct intel_guc *guc)
> {
> - return NULL;
> + /* FIXME: Cover the check under a lock ? */
> + if (!guc->log.relay_chan)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Just get the base address of a new sub buffer and copy data into it
> + * ourselves. NULL will be returned in no-overwrite mode, if all sub
> + * buffers are full. Could have used the relay_write() to indirectly
> + * copy the data, but that would have been bit convoluted, as we need to
> + * write to only certain locations inside a sub buffer which cannot be
> + * done without using relay_reserve() along with relay_write(). So its
> + * better to use relay_reserve() alone.
> + */
> + return relay_reserve(guc->log.relay_chan, 0);
> }
You have to chase through the code a long way to check whether or not
the allocation is correct.
Please do consider adding a check such as
GEM_BUG_ON(guc->log.relay_chan->size < guc->log.vma->size);
(near the allocation)
GEM_BUG_ON(write_offset + buffer_size > guc->log.relay_chan->size);
(before the memcpy, or whatever is appropriate).
Just to leave some clues to the reader as to what is going on.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
