On pe, 2016-08-12 at 11:28 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Since commit 43566dedde54 ("drm/i915: Broaden application of
> set-domain(GTT)") we allowed objects to be in the GTT domain, but unbound.
> Therefore removing the GTT cache domain when removing the GGTT vma is no
> longer semantically correct.
> 
> An unfortunate side-effect is we lose the wondrously named
> i915_gem_object_finish_gtt(), not to be confused with
> i915_gem_gtt_finish_object()!
> 

Does what it promises.

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to