But in the bug report the pciid=0x5916 and rev=0x0, which makes it KBL A0, right? So something else must be going on here. There also seems to be a mismatch between #2226938, #2225763 and #2225601 in terms of what the wa should be, some make reference to bit[30]. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
- [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Limit WaDisableDynamicCred... Mika Kuoppala
- [Intel-gfx] ✓ Ro.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/kbl: Limi... Patchwork
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Limit WaDisableDy... Matthew Auld
- Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/kbl: Limit WaDisab... Mika Kuoppala