On ke, 2016-08-10 at 08:38 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 10:29:59AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> >
> > On su, 2016-08-07 at 15:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > if (obj->pin_display) {
> > > - mappable_size += i915_gem_obj_ggtt_size(obj);
> > > - ++mappable_count;
> > > + pin_size += obj->base.size;
> > > + ++pin_count;
> > variables names to form pin_display_*
> No.
>
> >
> > >
> > > + seq_printf(m, "%u mapped objects, %llu bytes\n",
> > > + mapped_count, mapped_size);
> > > + seq_printf(m, "%u pinned objects, %llu bytes\n",
> > "display pinned objects"
> Disagree as well.
Would be in line with the "i915_gem_pin_display" in sysfs. If not, then
keep the previous test condition?
Regards, Joonas
> -Chris
>
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
