Yes we had the issue of incorrect edid read.
But as of now you can go ahead with the revert.
I have moved to a different group, so I am not working on this anymore.

Regards,
Sonika

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Wilson [mailto:ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2016 8:02 PM
To: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>; Jindal, Sonika <sonika.jin...@intel.com>; 
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915: Check live status before reading 
edid

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 02:39:47PM +0300, David Weinehall wrote:
> I'm feeling sorely tempted to treat this as a proper regression, and 
> simply submit a revert patch, seeing as it slows down resume by 
> something like 200ms, but seeing as there was mention of a case where 
> incorrect EDID-information might end up being read after resume on 
> some Chromebooks, I'll just try to open a discussion instead.

Wrt https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97139 this is a regression and 
I'll ack the revert. Yes, we need to resolve exactly how we get a stall between 
intel_hdmi_detect() and pageflip/cursor, but the onus is on the submitter of 
the patch to fix existing issues first to prevent such regressions (if 
possible, or else mitigate them).
-Chris

--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to