On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:21:37PM +0300, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> writes: > > > Let's ensure that we cannot run indefinitely without the hangcheck > > worker being queued. We removed it from being kicked on every request > > because we were kicking it a few millions times in every hangcheck > > interval and only once is necessary! However, that leaves us with the > > issue of what if userspace never waits for a request, or runs out of > > resources, what if userspace just issues a request then spins on > > BUSY_IOCTL? > > > > Testcase: igt/gem_busy > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com> > > Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
Ta, I'm going to push this pair as they fix a couple of (new) igt. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
