Regards
Shashank

On 6/16/2016 7:10 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:11:50PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote:
Regards
Shashank
On 6/8/2016 4:11 PM, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

Now that eDP encoders won't have can_mst==true, we can throw out
the encoder type checks from the MST suspend/resume paths.

Cc: Dave Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 28 ++++++++++------------------
   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 0ab4f319f88f..29fb0d907f7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -5659,15 +5659,12 @@ void intel_dp_mst_suspend(struct drm_device *dev)
        /* disable MST */
        for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
                struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = 
dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[i];
-               if (!intel_dig_port)
+
+               if (!intel_dig_port || !intel_dig_port->dp.can_mst)
                        continue;

-               if (intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
-                       if (!intel_dig_port->dp.can_mst)
-                               continue;
-                       if (intel_dig_port->dp.is_mst)
-                               
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_suspend(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
-               }
+               if (intel_dig_port->dp.is_mst)
+                       
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_suspend(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
        }
   }

@@ -5678,18 +5675,13 @@ void intel_dp_mst_resume(struct drm_device *dev)

        for (i = 0; i < I915_MAX_PORTS; i++) {
                struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = 
dev_priv->hotplug.irq_port[i];
-               if (!intel_dig_port)
-                       continue;
-               if (intel_dig_port->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
-                       int ret;
+               int ret;

-                       if (!intel_dig_port->dp.can_mst)
-                               continue;
+               if (!intel_dig_port || !intel_dig_port->dp.can_mst)
+                       continue;

-                       ret = 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
-                       if (ret != 0) {
-                               intel_dp_check_mst_status(&intel_dig_port->dp);
-                       }
-               }
+               ret = 
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_resume(&intel_dig_port->dp.mst_mgr);
+               if (ret)
+                       intel_dp_check_mst_status(&intel_dig_port->dp);
Now when we are modifying this code, can we please check the return
value of this function 'intel_dp_check_mst_status' which returns an int ?

I'll leave that to someone that cares about MST, and undestands what the
code does.

Yes, I guess. And also, I think he would be the more appropriate person to review the mess we are making around MST code :).
- Shashank
        }
   }


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to