If the user doesn't override the default values of the GuC-related
kernel parameters, then on a non-GuC-based platform we shouldn't
mention that we haven't loaded the GuC firmware.

The various messages have been reordered into a least->most severe
cascade (none/INFO/INFO/ERROR) for ease of comprehension.

Signed-off-by: Dave Gordon <david.s.gor...@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
index 41f7c7d..05732e3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c
@@ -525,12 +525,14 @@ int intel_guc_setup(struct drm_device *dev)
                ret = 0;
        }
 
-       if (err == 0)
+       if (err == 0 && !HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev))
+               ;       /* Don't mention the GuC! */
+       else if (err == 0)
                DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load skipped\n");
-       else if (ret == -EIO)
-               DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
-       else
+       else if (ret != -EIO)
                DRM_INFO("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
+       else
+               DRM_ERROR("GuC firmware load failed: %d\n", err);
 
        if (i915.enable_guc_submission) {
                if (fw_path == NULL)
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to