Oops. Hw default for programming these fields to 0 is "skip link training". Display won't take that too well usually.
v2: Unbotch the math a bit. v3: Drop debug hunk. Tested-by: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> Cc: Lyude <cp...@redhat.com> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95176 Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jin...@intel.com> Cc: Durgadoss R <durgados...@intel.com> Cc: "Pandiyan, Dhinakaran" <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index c3abae4bc596..a788d1e9589b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -280,7 +280,10 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) * with the 5 or 6 idle patterns. */ uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames); - uint32_t val = 0x0; + uint32_t val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE; + + val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT; + val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT; if (IS_HASWELL(dev)) val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES; @@ -288,14 +291,50 @@ static void hsw_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY; - I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val | - max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT | - idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT | - EDP_PSR_ENABLE); + if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 5) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 1) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_500us; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 0) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us; + else + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us; + + if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 0) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us; + else + val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us; + + if (intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(intel_dp) && + drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd)) + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL; + else + val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL; + + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR_CTL, val); + + if (!dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) + return; + + /* FIXME: selective update is probably totally broken because it doesn't + * mesh at all with our frontbuffer tracking. And the hw alone isn't + * good enough. */ + val = EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE; + + if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5) + val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_2500; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1) + val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_500; + else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 0) + val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_100; + else + val |= EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_50; - if (dev_priv->psr.psr2_support) - I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, EDP_PSR2_ENABLE | - EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE | EDP_PSR2_TP2_TIME_100); + I915_WRITE(EDP_PSR2_CTL, val); } static bool intel_psr_match_conditions(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) -- 2.8.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
