On 15/05/16 18:32, Zhi Wang wrote:
This patch introduces an approach to track the execlist context status
change.

GVT-g uses GVT context as the "shadow context". The content inside GVT
context will be copied back to guest after the context is idle. So GVT-g
has to know the status of the execlist context.

This function is configurable in the context creation service. Currently,
Only GVT-g will create the "status-change-notification" enabled GEM
context.

Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.w...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  |  5 +++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h |  5 +++++
  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7f050a3..1c9e865 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -884,6 +884,8 @@ struct intel_context {
                bool initialised;
                bool skip_init_context;
                u32 ring_buffer_size;
+               bool enable_status_change_notification;

This flag will be per context and not per context-engine, correct? In which case it would be worth moving it to the context. Would make execlists_context_status_change cheaper as well.

+               struct atomic_notifier_head status_notifier_head;
        } engine[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
        bool use_48bit_addressing_mode;

@@ -2403,6 +2405,9 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_request {

        /** Execlists context hardware id. */
        unsigned ctx_hw_id;
+
+       /** GVT workload **/
+       void *gvt_workload;

Why is this a void *, for what it will be used ? I can't see in this patch series what will be stored here so asking. Is it only temporary until further patches?

Also, is it really per-request? I am just wondering since other patches are mostly concerned about contexts.

  };

  struct drm_i915_gem_request * __must_check
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 0a96d4a..aeaea2e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -415,6 +415,19 @@ static void execlists_submit_requests(struct 
drm_i915_gem_request *rq0,
        spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->uncore.lock);
  }

+static inline void execlists_context_status_change(
+               struct drm_i915_gem_request *req,
+               unsigned long status)
+{
+       if (!req->ctx->engine[req->engine->id].
+                       enable_status_change_notification)
+               return;
+
+       atomic_notifier_call_chain(
+                       &req->ctx->engine[req->engine->id].status_notifier_head,
+                       status, req->gvt_workload);
+}

I would really like to see this compiled out when !CONFIG_DRM_I915_GVT. Otherwise is just adding useless conditionals on submission fast paths.

+
  static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
  {
        struct drm_i915_gem_request *req0 = NULL, *req1 = NULL;
@@ -450,6 +463,11 @@ static void execlists_context_unqueue(struct 
intel_engine_cs *engine)
        if (unlikely(!req0))
                return;

+       execlists_context_status_change(req0, CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
+
+       if (req1)
+               execlists_context_status_change(req1, CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN);
+
        if (req0->elsp_submitted & engine->idle_lite_restore_wa) {
                /*
                 * WaIdleLiteRestore: make sure we never cause a lite restore
@@ -488,6 +506,8 @@ execlists_check_remove_request(struct intel_engine_cs 
*engine, u32 ctx_id)
        if (--head_req->elsp_submitted > 0)
                return 0;

+       execlists_context_status_change(head_req, CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_OUT);
+
        list_del(&head_req->execlist_link);
        i915_gem_request_unreference(head_req);

@@ -2541,6 +2561,9 @@ static int execlists_context_deferred_alloc(struct 
intel_context *ctx,
        ctx->engine[engine->id].state = ctx_obj;
        ctx->engine[engine->id].initialised = engine_initialised(ctx, engine);

+       if (ctx->engine[engine->id].enable_status_change_notification)
+               ATOMIC_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(
+                               &ctx->engine[engine->id].status_notifier_head);
        return 0;

  error_ringbuf:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index 1afba03..98c94ee 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -57,6 +57,11 @@
  #define GEN8_CSB_READ_PTR(csb_status) \
        (((csb_status) & GEN8_CSB_READ_PTR_MASK) >> 8)

+enum {
+       CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN = 0,
+       CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_OUT,
+};
+
  /* Logical Rings */
  int intel_logical_ring_alloc_request_extras(struct drm_i915_gem_request 
*request);
  int intel_logical_ring_reserve_space(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request);


Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to