In order to reduce the workload of the caller, we do not want to
actually have to retire requests of others when checking the status of
this object.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +-------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 8439867..474c027 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3069,14 +3069,8 @@ i915_gem_object_flush_active(struct drm_i915_gem_object 
*obj)
                if (req == NULL)
                        continue;
 
-               if (list_empty(&req->list))
-                       goto retire;
-
-               if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true)) {
-                       __i915_gem_request_retire__upto(req);
-retire:
+               if (i915_gem_request_completed(req, true))
                        i915_gem_object_retire__read(obj, i);
-               }
        }
 
        return 0;
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to