From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>

The comment about GMBUSFREQ is confused. The spec actually explains
the 4MHz thing perfectly by noting that the 4MHz divider values is
actually just bits [9:2] not [9:0], hence the divide by 1000 correct.
Replace the confused note with a quote from the spec, and eliminate
the duplicated comment that snuck in.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 15 +++++----------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index ea55dd331fac..ec9144ded255 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -5311,18 +5311,13 @@ static void intel_update_cdclk(struct drm_device *dev)
                         dev_priv->cdclk_freq);
 
        /*
-        * Program the gmbus_freq based on the cdclk frequency.
-        * BSpec erroneously claims we should aim for 4MHz, but
-        * in fact 1MHz is the correct frequency.
+        * 9:0 CMBUS [sic] CDCLK frequency (cdfreq):
+        * Programmng [sic] note: bit[9:2] should be programmed to the number
+        * of cdclk that generates 4MHz reference clock freq which is used to
+        * generate GMBus clock. This will vary with the cdclk freq.
         */
-       if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev)) {
-               /*
-                * Program the gmbus_freq based on the cdclk frequency.
-                * BSpec erroneously claims we should aim for 4MHz, but
-                * in fact 1MHz is the correct frequency.
-                */
+       if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv) || IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
                I915_WRITE(GMBUSFREQ_VLV, DIV_ROUND_UP(dev_priv->cdclk_freq, 
1000));
-       }
 
        if (dev_priv->max_cdclk_freq == 0)
                intel_update_max_cdclk(dev);
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to