When we added atomic watermarks, we added a new display vfunc
'compute_pipe_wm' that is used to compute any pipe-specific watermark
information that we can at atomic check time.  This was a somewhat poor
naming choice since we already had a 'skl_compute_pipe_wm' function that
doesn't quite fit this model --- the existing SKL function is something
that gets used at atomic commit time, after the DDB allocation has been
determined.  Let's rename the existing SKL function to avoid confusion.

Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index 24b4b83..7a4dc9d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -3327,9 +3327,9 @@ static void skl_compute_transition_wm(struct 
intel_crtc_state *cstate,
        }
 }
 
-static void skl_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
-                               struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
-                               struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
+static void skl_build_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
+                             struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb,
+                             struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm)
 {
        struct drm_device *dev = cstate->base.crtc->dev;
        const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
@@ -3596,7 +3596,7 @@ static bool skl_update_pipe_wm(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
        struct intel_crtc_state *cstate = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state);
 
        skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(cstate, ddb);
-       skl_compute_pipe_wm(cstate, ddb, pipe_wm);
+       skl_build_pipe_wm(cstate, ddb, pipe_wm);
 
        if (!memcmp(&intel_crtc->wm.active.skl, pipe_wm, sizeof(*pipe_wm)))
                return false;
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to