On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:48:36AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2016-04-20 at 19:42 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > static bool
> > -needs_pd_load_pre(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, struct intel_context *to)
> > +needs_pd_load_pre(struct i915_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt,
> > + struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
> > + struct intel_context *to)
> > {
> > - if (!to->ppgtt)
> > + if (ppgtt == NULL)
>
> Code checker will scream and ask for !ppgtt. And I'm pretty sure we
> should not keep flip-flopping between two styles. Also, you're not
> doing != NULL either to check if pointer is not NULL, but just if
> (foo), so I do not see why to avoid if (!foo).
I normally do do != NULL :(
Oh, well. I give in. Can I also stop writing NULL everywhere and just
use 0 in pointer contexts?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
